🔗 Share this article

I have a few thoughts regarding that comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer after the Serbian champion's win over Taylor Fritz in the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is the United States, Fowler is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently encourage nationalism. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the tournament.

Everyone enjoy a storyline, myself included. But come on. Even if Fritz defeated Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was waiting in the next round, whom Fritz has never defeated in an competitive encounter. And had he someway gotten past that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also split the last seven major titles (plus Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the chance to defeat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. He is well within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Serbian last eight match what other person sensibly had the drought of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the sole barrier standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the future. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of ranking points away. His top-class serve and powerful power on each front side and backhand are sufficiently adequate to dispose of most opponents on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, though, Fritz is often helpless. The last several seasons has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and fluidity of smaller players. Fritz is six-foot-five and looks it. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was controlling, and hitting a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential.

Fritz has made a number of significant, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the bottom of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was approaching the elite ten. The previous season, he unexpectedly surged to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, competing against and beating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a declining Serbian, is the highest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth commenting on the continuing drought of American men lifting major titles when he had exited the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the respect for the difficulty of the challenge insufficient.

Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in the summer.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match should have been sufficient of an sign. The Serbian won in four sets, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few championship opportunities and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The pair appeared well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz creating numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued break point after break point, extending the run to the brink of frustration. When Fritz eventually did claim one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a horrendous game to drop serve again; the Serbian had lulled him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and forced him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Down set points in the final game, his primary delivery sailed to heaven. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but ultimately committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.

The contest was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is not good enough to defeat any form of Djokovic, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – Djokovic is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has developed enough experience and strategic intelligence to make up for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not done anything that suggested he would.

Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective voice in media sessions, exceeding virtually everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, prepared to not only express how he feels or the tactic he felt determined a contest, but explain it. That he should shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that the fellow American is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Player Divisions

American legend Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Division

• The Italian champion
• The German powerhouse
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American informed a journalist in the summer of winning a grand slam. It is hoped he understands that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that breaking through the Spanish and Italian's dominant, formidable reign is actually extremely unlikely for all other players. {